-
Interdimensional Universe: The New Science of UFOs, Paranormal Phenomena and Otherdimensional Beings
Tags: Beings, Interdimensional, Otherdimensional, Paranormal, Phenomena, Science, UFOs, Universe
Posted in DVDs and books on February 12th, 2010 by RoswellUFOs.com- ISBN13: 9780738713472
- Condition: NEW
- Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
Product Description
Over the course of his thirty years of investigation into UFOs, including his own field research, photographic evidence, and meticulously compiled case studies, Philip Imbrogno has provided fascinating new insight into paranormal phenomena. In this book, he reveals for the first time the detailed findings of prominent paranormal experts as well as his own firsthand experiences.The UFO Phenomenon: Fascinating New Theories and Never-Before-Released PhotosUsing the lat… More >>Interdimensional Universe: The New Science of UFOs, Paranormal Phenomena and Otherdimensional Beings
Popularity: 23%

My Brother The Debunker
Dan Aykroyd, Unplugged on UFOs – on CNN Anderson Cooper
Flying Saucers and Science: A Scientist Investigates the Mysteries of UFOs: Interstellar Travel, Crashes, and Government Cover-Ups
Twitter Updates for 2009-08-18
Why don’t we hear UFO abduction stories from African-Americans or other minorities?
Reptile Woman – UFO Reptilian / Demon Morphing
5 Responses to “Interdimensional Universe: The New Science of UFOs, Paranormal Phenomena and Otherdimensional Beings”
Leave a Reply
Get in touch with us!
@RoswellUFOs says: Follow us on Twitter for the latest news
Keywords
Popular
- 20%UFO Greatest Story Ever Denied - NASA space secrets
- 19%Extreme UFO Encounters Based On Newly Declassified X-Files
- 11%real UFO sighting during CNN broadcast
- 11%Dan Aykroyd, Unplugged on UFOs - on CNN Anderson Cooper
- 9%The Arrivals pt.19 (The UFO Phenomena)
- 7%Physicist Calls UFO Cover-up a 'Cosmic Watergate'
- 6%UFO NASA's unexplained tether overload incident
- 6%Brit hacking Pentagon for UFO info stays home - UK govt
- 6%Best UFO Cases Caught On Tape
- 6%Crash: When UFOs Fall From the Sky: A History of Famous Incidents, Conspiracies, and Cover-Ups
- 6%Lies & Deception: UFO's & the Secret Agenda
- 6%Chinese Airport Closed After UFO Spotted Flying Over City
- 5%History Channel UFO Hunters 305 Nazi Ufos 2009-1.avi
- 5%British X-Files describe secret UFO encounters
- 4%UFO Documentary - Full Production


February 12th, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Kids are confused about magic. Parents tell them it is just a combinations of tricks, but cannot explain how magician’s tricks work (good analogy by the author). Therefore, when you read such a book about unexplained phenomena, evaluation comes from two angles: is it interesting and well written?, does it contain credible facts?, do I believe in all this, did it changed my opinion?
I gave 3 stars for excellent writing mostly. It is well arranged text that reads fast and some parts are truly interesting (for example: about pictures taken from the space and how to make and use satellite-receiving station). There are plenty of old episodes/encounters mentioned (between 1947 and 1997), however we do not have listed anything about more recent encounters from XXI century (have anything happened at all during the past 8 years?).
Why do people experience all unusual phenomena like UFOs, and encounter strange aliens/monsters only during the night or in their dreams?; it is a quite large dilemma for me. Unfortunately we are not offered any explanation for it..
As for credibility I have several problems. The basis for Mr.Imbrogno to explain “unexplained” are string theory, existence of extra dimensions and parallel multiverses. Science knows that “stargates” across the space-time can possibly last only for a very, VERY short periods of time. As for today we have neither proved that string theory is correct nor that extra dimensions or multiverses are true. Mathematics behind strings predicts extra 10 dimensions + time (author claims 21 dimensions), but even if they exist they are incredibly tiny and compactified not allowing for any living “things” to be visible by naked eye. Forces (like gravity) are allowed to “leak” across dimensions, but large baseball-field objects not. Also, if other multiverses exist in a form of M-branes, they would have completely different governing laws of physics. Therefore his HIGHLY speculative hypothesis about “tunnels” connecting us with multidimensions and allowing us to see creatures or objects from there is not only improbable, but has roots in other not so far verified scientific hypotheses. Experiments in CERN (LHC) may show if extra small compact dimensions are real. But, I have to admit, example with the finger and sheet of paper (flatland) is nifty.
Mr. Imbrogno also quotes Dr. Hynek: “one witness is no witness”. However across the whole book he mostly uses stories obtained from single, unverifiable witnesses.
Lets take famous Bermuda Triangle. Quote: “As for the XXI century, hundreds of ships and planes have simply vanished in the Triangle”. I would like to know exactly how many and what kind of ships/planes vanished as well as source of this data. Another typical example: “Project Invisibility” (also called “Philadelphia Experiment” or “Project Rainbow”). It is nicely presented but I give it zero credibility for the same reason as above – lack of documentation. Author claims, project had foundation in Roswell alien ship crush and did not take place in Philadelphia’s naval yard . There are other books of this type linking this experiment (or experiments?) to the capture of secret Nazi’s technology based on Einstein’s discarded Classical Unified Field Theory. All this is confusing and here Mr. Imbrogno is only right once by stating: “..the material that has been made available to the public was mostly misinformation”.
In general author throws into the same bag: pictures from the space (I have to admit perplexing one), electromagnetic pulses, vortexes to other dimensions, angels, demons, creators, “nut and bolts” space crafts, mystic stones and caves/mains, human-like creatures (good and nasty, visible and not visible), souls, old believes/religions, psychics, “dream almanacs”, crop circles, animal mutilations etc. you name it. It is sometimes hard to swallow …unless one had its own paranormal episode. I have not had one so far. Therefore I recommend this book rather for science-FICTION enthusiasts only.
Rating: 3 / 5
February 12th, 2010 at 11:03 pm
I cn’t remember when I have read such an interesting book. I actually read it all in one night.. I am watching the skies and have to get the other books by this author
Rating: 5 / 5
February 13th, 2010 at 12:48 am
This book does not rehash old stuff it actually presents new material and should be read by all who have an interest in the paranormal and UFOs. I just turned 13 and know the author and can tell you that his stories about UFOs are just as interesting as his writing.
Rating: 5 / 5
February 13th, 2010 at 2:06 am
This book took me on an adventure and I found it so interesting I rea it in two days. The author uses a great deal of information about UFOs to make a case that we should loo further. Its a great read and if you want to knw about the history of UFOs I reccomend it.
Rating: 5 / 5
February 13th, 2010 at 3:47 am
Like books and documentary-style programming on the paranormal, most of information comes from eye-witnesses and anecdotal evidence. No matter how much of an expert the author/researcher claims to be. there’s rarely empirically tested or collected data to back up the evidence presented. That said, these stories do make for interesting, exciting and thought-provoking stories.
In this book, the author posits that much of UFO experiences may in fact be visitors from another dimension as opposed to from other planets. It sounds totally wacky, until you consider the fact that some theoretical physicists today claim that there may be as many as 26 dimensions — the majority of which completely unperceivable to human senses. Again, nothing other than speculation to back any of this up, but it’s fun to think about. I took this whole thing with a million grains of sand. But if you’re a fan this sort of thing, you’ll like it. If you’re a hard science-only type, you’ll obviously stay away without my recommendation.
Rating: 3 / 5